A growing number of young professionals are choosing to take an extended break from work — not because they’ve been made redundant or are burnt out, but because they want to rethink their relationship with work altogether.
Dubbed “mini-retirements” or “micro-retirements,” the trend, featured this week in The New York Times, sees workers in their 20s and 30s voluntarily leaving jobs for months at a time to travel, rest or simply recalibrate their lives. Rather than waiting until their 60s to enjoy a well-earned pause, these workers are carving out moments of stillness now.
While sabbaticals have traditionally been the preserve of tenured academics or long-serving employees in large organisations, this newer phenomenon is more self-directed and informal. It reflects, experts say, a wider cultural shift away from hustle culture and towards a more balanced view of success.
Redefining Work-Life Balance
Dr Kira Schabram, a University of Washington academic quoted in the New York Times, has been researching the phenomenon and notes that workers are increasingly bypassing formal company sabbaticals in favour of independently financed breaks. “People are just taking it into their own hands,” she said.
In the UK, anecdotal evidence suggests the trend is catching on — especially among digital professionals, creatives and those able to freelance.
Critics argue that these career breaks are largely by those who are financially secure, pointing out that many people simply cannot afford to step away from paid work. Most of those profiled in the Times story had access to savings, family support or freelance income streams.
But the motivation behind these breaks often stems from something deeper than financial flexibility. As one mini-retiree, Sandra De La Cruz, told the Times, stepping away helped her develop a resilience and self-belief that carried over into her return to work. “I have less fear of change,” she said.
A Response to Post-Pandemic Priorities
The COVID-19 pandemic catalysed a global reckoning with work-life balance. Concepts like “quiet quitting” and “acting your wage” emerged in response to feelings of disillusionment with traditional employment models. In this context, mini-retirements can be seen as a more radical form of disengagement — a rejection of linear career progression in favour of a more personally meaningful path.
Christopher Myers, a management professor at Johns Hopkins, pointed out the cultural contrast in the NYT feature: “Europeans have a ‘micro-retirement’ every year — they call it summer vacation.” That quip highlights a cultural reality. In the UK and US, long breaks from work are still seen as indulgent, while elsewhere they’re viewed as restorative.
HR and Employer Implications
Employers would be wise to watch this trend closely, experts say. While not everyone can afford a mini-retirement, the desire for a periodic break from work is real — and rising. Flexible leave policies, sabbatical options and return-to-work programmes could help retain talent that might otherwise walk away altogether.
For now, mini-retirements remain a niche option, but more workers are choosing to live now, rather than delaying joy until retirement. And with job mobility on the rise and burnout increasingly common, who can blame them?